Legal Opinion

Mountain View Sanitarium Co. v. Huntley

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 14, 1927No. 9990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

The only question in this case is whether the plaintiff is entitled to be classified for the purpose of taxation as a personal service corporation within the meaning of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057 [Comp. St. § 6336%a]), which provides: “The term ‘personal service corporation’ means a corporation whose income is to, be ascribed primarily to the activities of the principal owners or stockholders who are themselves regularly engaged in the active conduct of the affairs of the corporation and in which capital (whether invested or borrowed) is not a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hubbard-Ragsdale Co. v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Distributors v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  2. Edward P. Allison Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Strayer's Business College, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  4. Hurst, Anthony & Watkins, Inc. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Alexander, Conover & Martin, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API