Legal Opinion

Ryzak v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 2016No. 2014-11781PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated October 30, 2014, which, upon the granting of the defendants’ separate motions pursuant to CPLR 4401, both made at the close of the plaintiff’s case, for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

“A trial court’s grant of a CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate where the trial court finds that, upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Schneider v. Kings Highway Hospital Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Figueroa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Gomez v. CasigliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diorio v. Ossining Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API