Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Harris

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1975No. Docket 20928Published

1Dissent

*510D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

(dissenting). The testimony of the police handwriting expert was essential to the prosecution in convicting the defendant. Without it the prosecution could not prove that the defendant was the person who delivered the guardrails to the scrapyard and received the money. Whether or not the trial court considered the scrapyard employee a perjurer, his testimony that he could not identify who delivered the guardrails must be controlling unless the handwriting analysis is admissible.

It is a general rule that this Court will not review a claimed error unless a timely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People v. KirtdollMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Flickema v. Henry Kraker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Champion v. ChampionMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Campbell v. Charles J. Rogers Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API