Legal Opinion
In re Myron Goldstein, R.P.T., P. C.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
It must be recognized that the services of the members of various professions, here physiotherapy, by the very nature of the professional and ethical responsibilities of its members are not subject to control to the same extent or in the same manner as are other personal services (Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assoc. [Roberts], 60 NY2d 734). Given that characteristic of the services rendered in this case, we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the decision of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Salamanca Nursing Home, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mowry v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re HTA of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Manhattan Manor Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re Holbrook Speech Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.