Legal Opinion

Thompkins v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert E. Torres, J.), entered April 25, 2011, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating plaintiff’s claims that she sustained a “permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member” and/or a “significant limitation of use of a body function or system,” and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff suffered injuries to her left foot, ankle and knee as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Lee Yuen v. Arka Memory Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Mitchell v. CalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Grant v. United Pavers Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Melo v. GrullonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Daniels v. S.R.M. Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Daniels v. S.R.M. Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API