Legal Opinion
State v. Dyreson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 6, 2001No. 19072-2-III, 19073-1-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 P.3d 668 (2001)
104 Wash.App. 703
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Wilma L. DYRESON and Danny Lee Austin, Appellants.
Nos. 19072-2-III, 19073-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
February 6, 2001.
David N. Gasch, Spokane, for Appellants.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Pros. Attys., Spokane, for Respondent.
BROWN, A.C.J.
After a stipulated facts trial, Wilma Dyreson and Danny Lee Austin were found guilty of possessing marijuana seen by a detective after a warrantless entry into the appellants' garage. We decide the trial court erred by denying suppression of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WoljevachOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. PosenjakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. PosenjakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. HalpernNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.