Legal Opinion

Gaskins v. Courson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1925No. 16190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. “Where testimony a part of which is admissible is objected to as a whole, it is not error to overrule the objection.” Eckman v. State, 23 Ga. App. 392 (98 S. E. 187), and cases cited in the opinion. This ruling disposes of the first special ground of the motion for a new trial.

2. Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete and understandable within itself, without reference to the brief of evidence or to any other part of the record. Under these decisions we are not called upon to consider the second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eckman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API