Battles v. City of Mobile
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Robert Battles, Jr., was convicted of failing to obey an order of a police officer, a violation of City of Mobile Ordinance no. 39-54, of the Mobile City Code. He was fined $250 plus court costs.
I
The appellant asserts that Ordinance no. 39-54 is unconstitutional both facially and as applied to his case. That ordinance provides:
"(a) It shall be unlawful and an offense against the city for any person to fail to obey the direction or order of a member of the police department of the city while such member is acting in an official capacity in carrying out his duties."
The appellant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Battles v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000