Legal Opinion
Hassett v. Celtic Holdings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 13, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*365Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In merely citing general safety standards, plaintiff has not sufficiently pleaded a violation of a specific provision of the Industrial Code (Labor Law § 241 [6]; see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494 [1993]). Plaintiff cannot rely on the general provisions of 12 NYCRR 23-1.5 (c) (3), requiring an employer to keep equipment and safety devices in proper working…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Williams v. White Haven Memorial Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hawkins v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Anarumo v. Slattery Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Misicki v. CaradonnaNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cambizaca v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Conforti v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Maday v. Gabe's Contracting, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.