Legal Opinion
Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Vine
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 13, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Reed.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
Oh April 3d, 1903, the defendants agreed to receive of complainant “a sufficient number of trading stamps, to be supplied as a discount for cash trade to all persons who may call for them,” to pay complainant for all stamps disposed of and “not to use any other coupons, trading stamps or similar device during the existence of this contract.” The contract contained also the following clause: “No dry goods, shoes or gents’ furnishing store within two blocks either way to have S. & H. stamps without consent of Vine Brothers.”
The defendants,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- E. Jersey Water Co. v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Johnson v. Bruckhart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1934
- Radio Corp., C. v. De Forest Radio, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925