Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Matovich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1959No. Appeal, 120PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to the plaintiffs in an assumpsit action after the jury awarded them $1 for legal services which they had rendered to the defendant.

Joseph Matovich, the defendant in this case, had been declared incompetent and his brother had been appointed guardian of his estate. The guardian had jiurchased a farm in Washington County with funds belonging to the defendant and wrongfully retained a life estate therein. The defendant employed David A. Friedman, Esq. and John A. Metz, Jr., Esq., both members of the Allegheny County…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Pennsylvania Co., for Ins. on Lives v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Mains v. MOORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Iwankow v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eck v. Powermatic HoudailleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Phelps v. Paul L. Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Berkeihiser v. DIBARTOLOMEROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Caine v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API