Legal Opinion

Gray v. Cooper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

-Action for damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff recovered and defendant appealed.

Defendant, Cooper, was the owner of a pit of clay described as dias pore clay and burley clay, the latter being of cheaper grade than the former. These parties entered into a written contract, the essential parts of which are as follows:

“That party of the first part for and in consideration of the price and sum hereinafter specified agrees to furnish F. O. B. cars, St. James, Mo., two cars of Dias Pore clay and one car of second or Burley clay, if the cars are furnished when the clay is ordered, and if the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rickey v. TenbroeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Reigart v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Hudson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Martin v. Ray County Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. Leesley Bros v. A. Rebori Fruit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denney v. Spot Martin, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WarnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Dugan v. TroutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API