Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1930No. A-7012Published

1DissentDavenport, J.

I cannot agree with tbe majority opinion wherein it is held that instruction No. 12 properly and correctly stated tbe law applicable to tbe facts in this case, nor can I agree that tbe testimony of Mrs. Joe Baccus, wherein she testified to alleged threats tbe defendant should have made prior to tbe dance, was admissible, as tbe threats as testified to by Mrs. Baccus in ■ no way whatever could have related to the deceased, for tbe reason that, at tbe time the alleged threats were made, if they were made, the deceased and defendant were friendly, and subsequent to that time tbe deceased and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wireman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Larry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API