Legal Opinion

Hoey v. Harty

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent. Case. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This case comes here on error assigned on the record, no bill of exceptions having been settled. It isnrged here that the declaration would not sustain the judgment, as counts in assumpsit and counts in tort were joined in the same declaration and that such a joinder was fatal, and that upon this declaration a general verdict \was rendered.

There was no such joinder; each and every count was in assumpsit, in some of which matters by way of aggravation were set forth. This does not change the form of the count from assumpsit to tort. The other objections we cannot consider on this record.

The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brucker v. Manistee & Grand Rapids RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Straus Land Corp. v. DupuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API