State v. Jones
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
The State appeals an order granting Jeremy Nicholas Jones’ motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
A trial court’s ruling on a motion- to suppress comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness; we must interpret the evidence and draw reasonable inferences and deductions in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978); Bonifay v. State, 626 So.2d 1310, 1312 (Fla. 1993). Because the totality of the circumstances…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McNamara v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Bonifay v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Hunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. M. B. W.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- State of Florida v. L. C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024