Legal Opinion

Estridge v. Stovall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 27, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order entered by the Harlan Circuit Court, upholding the constitutionality of KRS 342.800 and affirming the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reducing appellant Estridge’s black lung benefits under that statute. Appellants argue that the statute as written is unconstitutional because it discriminates unfairly among miners receiving black lung benefits and because it bears no rational relation to the purpose for which it was enacted. We find the statute to be constitutional and affirm the order of the circuit court.

In 1978 the Workers’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Kentucky Ass'n of Chiropractors v. Jefferson County Medical SocietyKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Chapman v. Eastern Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  5. Wells v. EstridgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Wynn v. Ibold, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Chapman v. GormanKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Leeco, Inc. v. CrabtreeKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Holbrook v. Lexmark International Group, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API