Legal Opinion

D'Wolf v. Babbett

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided November 15, 1826No. Case No. 4,220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STORY, Circuit Justice,

in summing up to the jury, said: If in this case there has been an absolute and unconditional delivery of the sugars to George D’Wolf, unaffected by fraud, the plaintiff is entitled to recover. So far as regards the 102 boxes of sugar delivered on Saturday, as that was after the terms of the personal credit had expired, which the counsel for the plaintiff supposes to exist, the delivery can be maintained as valid, only upon the supposition, that the whole transaction was bona fide, and the defendant, Babbett waived a compliance with the terms. At that time D’Wolf had…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. President of the Michigan State Bank v. HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Buck v. GrimshawNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Cole v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
  4. Gasquet v. Johnston-Brewsters' InterveningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  5. Williamson v. New Jersey Southern RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API