Legal Opinion

Hein v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court,, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding seeking to challenge respondent’s determination which found him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances. The determination was based, in part, on the positive results of two urinalysis tests which evidenced the presence of cannabinoids and opiates…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Murphy v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Lopez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Green Island Associates v. Adirondack Park AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Vale v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosario v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Beckles v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Dabney v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Kae v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Ortiz v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API