In re Tramel V.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated June 6, 2007, as, after a permanency hearing, extended the placement of the subject child until December 3, 2007, and found that the petitioner had exercised reasonable efforts to effect the permanency goal of return of the child to the parent.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as extended placement of the child is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is…