Legal Opinion

Macondray & Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1929No. 5542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The appellant contends that its cause of action as pleaded is one for money had and received, that its assignor paid the money to the appellee in consideration of the latter’s promise to make an April shipment of goods from New York, and that the appellee did not make a legally valid April shipment from New York and thereby the contract was put an end to, and that, even if the cause of action is not strictly one for money had and received, it is a case where the purchaser was induced by the seller to pay money under a mistake of facts by handing on April 20,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Harper v. HochstimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Blank v. AronsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. A. Klipstein & Co. v. DilsizianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Erman-Howell Division of Luria Steel & Trading Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API