Legal Opinion

Presthus v. Barco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided February 28, 1995No. 94-0715PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HABHAB, Judge.

The claimant, Chad Presthus, suffered repetitive motion injuries to his arms while working for Barco, Inc. Presthus claims the injuries extended to his shoulders. A treating physician, Dr. Crane, indicated Presthus had suffered a five percent permanent impairment to his right upper extremity and a three percent permanent impairment to his left upper extremity. Crane also stated the injury did not extend to Presthus’ shoulders.

Presthus filed a workers’ compensation claim with the industrial commissioner. Presthus presented evidence including lay testimony that he suffered a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson County Public Hospital v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Ward v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Higgins v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Amended September 20, 2016 David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API