Legal Opinion
Parker v. Citimortgage, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 12, 2013No. Civil No. 2:09-CV-00618 BSJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL
BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge.
On November 13, 2012, the Clerk of the Court docketed the mandate of the court of appeals in the above-captioned proceeding, affirming this court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and granting CitiMortgage’s motion for sanctions.1 The court of appeals remanded the matter “to the district court to determine the amount of costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by CitiMortgage in defending this appeal and to be paid by the trustee’s lawyer,” E. Craig…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emuveyan v. EwingDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Garvey v. Static MediaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023