Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Sher

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of Hew York, denying part of defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant put the plaintiff to work at or near a machine used for the manufacture' of buttons, without instructing him as to the manner of operating the same, and without warning him of the dangers reasonably to be expected from the operation *433thereof; that he had no knowledge of such dangers nor could he have obtained such knowledge without being informed thereof by the defendant or his servants; that, on March 5, 1907, while he was “ working at or near one of said machines, he was seriously injured ” by a portion of his thumb being cut off; that said injury was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Causullo v. Lenox Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaplan v. SherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API