Legal Opinion
Beijing Daddy's Choice Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Pinduoduo Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 2020No. 1:18-cv-06504Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------X BEIJING DADDY’S CHOICE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, 18 Civ. 6504 (NRB) - against - PINDUODUO INC., et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------X NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Beijing Daddy’s Choice Science and Technology Co., Ltd. brought this case against Pinduoduo Inc. and affiliated companies (collectively, “PDD”) for contributory infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and New York law. After…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Albert Farbotko v. Clinton County Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.