Legal Opinion

Bryceland v. Minogue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 10, 2014No. 13-1914UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTER, Associate Justice.

Marta Bryceland appeals the dismissal of her shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of Abiomed, Inc. Because Bryceland’s complaint fails to plead with the required particularity that a demand to the directors for remedial action would have been futile, we affirm.

On defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the following facts are taken as stated in the complaint. Abiomed is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Massachusetts. It develops products to assist or replace the pumping of the human heart, and the company’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Wood v. BaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fire and Police Pension Assoc v. Abiomed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API