Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Police Retiring Association, Inc. v. Walter N. Tobriner, Board of Commissioners for the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 21, 1962No. 16762PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The Superintendent of Insurance is head of the Department of Insurance of the District of Columbia, which functions under the direction of the Commissioners. 1 The Metropolitan Police Retiring Association, Inc., was thought by the Commissioners to be engaged in the “business of insurance” without a certificate of authority from the Superintendent as required by law. 2 The Commissioners filed suit in the District Court to enjoin the activities of the Association. The court in the order on appeal granted the motion of the Commissioners for summary judgment and denied that of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Jordan v. Group Health Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Ebert v. PostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Home Title InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Killebrew v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Technical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Washington Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. United Coastal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Farmer v. Monsanto CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Blewer v. Continental Assur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.