Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nichols
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
Under our statutes and decisions construing the same, a counterclaim is not permissible for a distinct and independent tort, and applying the principle, in an action to recover a tract of land alleged to belong to plaintiff, a counterclaim for a trespass by plaintiff on a different tract of land belonging to defendant is not maintainable. Street v. Andrews, 115 N. C., 417, 422; Bazemore v. Bridgers, 105 N. C., 191; C. S., 521, 522.
While this is the accepted principle, it is not a jurisdictional question, and the approved decisions on the subject are to the effect that the objection may be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Quelch v. . FutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Caveness v. Charlotte, Raleigh & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Brown v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Baggett v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Griffith v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Eller v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Eller v. . GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Duke Power Co. v. TomsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.