Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nichols

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Under our statutes and decisions construing the same, a counterclaim is not permissible for a distinct and independent tort, and applying the principle, in an action to recover a tract of land alleged to belong to plaintiff, a counterclaim for a trespass by plaintiff on a different tract of land belonging to defendant is not maintainable. Street v. Andrews, 115 N. C., 417, 422; Bazemore v. Bridgers, 105 N. C., 191; C. S., 521, 522.

While this is the accepted principle, it is not a jurisdictional question, and the approved decisions on the subject are to the effect that the objection may be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Quelch v. . FutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Caveness v. Charlotte, Raleigh & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Brown v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Baggett v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Griffith v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Eller v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Eller v. . GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Duke Power Co. v. TomsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API