Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Waldo v. Poetker

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1981No. CA 81-158Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Judge

I respectfully, but strongly disagree with the majority. Although there are cases which do suggest the proper reasoning to be used when strict construction of statutes would appear to mandate dual liability, Pucci v. Novel Lithographers, Inc., 29 A.D. 2d 590, 285 N.Y.S. 2d 362 (1967), the Supreme Court of Arkansas has given us guidance on the issue of strict construction. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Central Surety & Ins. Corp., 234 Ark. 160, 350 S.W. 2d 685 (1961) was a case involving Arkansas’ cancellation requirements. The employer had originally maintained a policy with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Central Surety & Ins.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Cowles v. State Ins. FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Claim of Pucci v. Novel Lithographers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API