Legal Opinion
Bon Harbor, LLC v. United Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 10, 2009No. 1070902 and 1070994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODALL, Justice.
Bon Harbor, LLC, and Michael F. Hinds appeal from two orders entered against them in an action commenced by United Bank (“the Bank”). We dismiss them appeals.
The underlying dispute arose following a series of transactions by which Bon Harbor received money from the Bank that Bon Harbor used to purchase certain real estate in Baldwin County. During these transactions, Hinds, one of Bon Harbor’s general managers, executed several continuing-guaranty agreements by which he assumed certain responsibilities for Bon Harbor’s indebtedness to the Bank. The details of these…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foster v. Greer and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Baugus v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Riley v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Reynolds v. Colonial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneth JAKEMAN v. LAWRENCE GROUP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Knoedler v. BlincoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Bon Harbor, LLC v. United BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Crider v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023