Legal Opinion

Tennis v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appé&l from Winnebago Circuit Court. Action upon a replevin bond. The defendants appeal from an order striking from the files their answer to the petition. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeoic, J.

i. jurisdtcXION * jimtiCC of tiio peace: venue. I. The plaintiff declares on a replevin bond given in an action brought before P. TI. Peterson, a justice of the peace of Norway township, Winnebago ** **■ J ^ county. The petition shows that judgment for the return of the property was rendered in the. action against the plaintiff therein, Haukness, which he has failed to perform as well as to pay the damages and costs adjudged against him. ITaukness and his surety, Anderson, are made defendants in this action. The surety answered the. petition alleging the following facts: That the defendant in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connell v. StelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bremner v. HallowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API