Legal Opinion

Ely v. O'Dell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1928No. 20958. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

On January 6, 1927, appellant recovered a judgment against respondent O’Dell for $696 and costs in an action for personal injuries, received through the negligent operation of an automobile by Miss O ’Dell. The complaint upon- which the case was tried, among other things, pleads an ordinance of the city of Seattle, and alleges:

“That at the time said defendant, Patricia O’Dell, struck the plaintiff, said defendant was driving and managing and propelling an automobile in a southerly direction on said University Way in a negligent, careless and unlawful manner, in this, that she was driving into…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. In re CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. United States v. ReedU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
  5. In re PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. DoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cogswell v. KellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fleshman v. TrolingerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  5. In Re TilleryDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API