Legal Opinion

United States v. Goldblatt Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1942No. 7797PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

The United States, claiming as a creditor under the Illinois Bulk Sales Law,1 sued defendant as the purchaser of the major part of the assets of the New Dahl Corporation, to ■ recover an indebtedness for unpaid taxes owing by New Dahl. There was a trial without a jury and the court made findings of fact, stated its conclusions of law thereon, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff. From that judgment, the defendant appeals.

Defendant is the owner of ten department stores located in Chicago and vicinity. Prior to November 22, 1937, New Dahl operated the shoe repair…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coon v. DossIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Shepard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Superior Plating Works v. Art Metal Crafts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  4. Tameling v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Winthrop Restaurant Co. v. KournetasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Landers Frary & Clark v. Vischer Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. Alexander v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  4. Noltze Motor Co. v. Burrows-Moore Pontiac, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  5. In re Central Metallic Casket Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API