Legal Opinion

Village of Kildeer v. Village of Lake Zurich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1988No. 2-87-0646PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hope

Plaintiff, the Village of Kildeer, brought this quo warranto action to challenge an annexation ordinance adopted by defendant, the Village of Lake Zurich. Lake Zurich’s ordinance purported to annex territory included in annexation ordinances previously filed by Kildeer. Lake Zurich appeals from the trial court order which denied its motion for summary judgment and granted Kildeer’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends that the trial court disposition was error because (1) Kildeer lacked standing to maintain a private quo warranto action, (2) the court failed to determine the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Village of Worth v. IhdeIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City of Countryside v. Village of La GrangeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Shapiro v. ShapiroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Rickard v. PozdalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. In Re Marriage of PetramaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Village of Mundelein v. Village of Long GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. U.S. Bank Trust National Ass'n. v. LopezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. Lee v. FosdickAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API