Legal Opinion

Gory v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Development Fund Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to defendant Neighborhood’s contention, the fact that the stairway on which plaintiff was working when he was injured was originally constructed as a permanent structure does not remove it from the reach of Labor Law § 240 (1). Not only had the stairway provided the sole means of access to the floors of the building during the demolition phase, but, in addition, it was an elevated surface on which plaintiff was required *551to work to complete his task of breaking up the marble pieces covering each step. The surrounding walls had been demolished, and the staircase had no guard rails.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Runner v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Mendoza v. Highpoint Associates, IX, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Mahoney v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API