City of Portsmouth v. Miller, Rhoads & Schwartz, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
This case arises upon a warrant charging that Miller, Rhoads & Schwartz, Incorporated, had violated the city-license tax ordinance in unlawfully operating a delivery truck in the city without obtaining a license therefor. It was submitted to the trial judge upon an agreed statement of facts, and there was a judgment in favor of the defendant.
These are the facts agreed:
The city of Portsmouth, Virginia, acting through its council, passed an ordinance on the 26th day of April, 1921, entitled “an ordinance imposing a license tax for the city of Portsmouth for the year beginning May 1, 1921.”
Sectio…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Heartt v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- White Oak Coal Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Frommer v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879
- Dooley & Bayless v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richmond-Petersburg Freight Lines, Inc. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- City of Portsmouth v. D. Pender Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924