Legal Opinion

City of Portsmouth v. Miller, Rhoads & Schwartz, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 20, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

This case arises upon a warrant charging that Miller, Rhoads & Schwartz, Incorporated, had violated the city-license tax ordinance in unlawfully operating a delivery truck in the city without obtaining a license therefor. It was submitted to the trial judge upon an agreed statement of facts, and there was a judgment in favor of the defendant.

These are the facts agreed:

The city of Portsmouth, Virginia, acting through its council, passed an ordinance on the 26th day of April, 1921, entitled “an ordinance imposing a license tax for the city of Portsmouth for the year beginning May 1, 1921.”

Sectio…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Heartt v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. White Oak Coal Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Frommer v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879
  5. Dooley & Bayless v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richmond-Petersburg Freight Lines, Inc. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. City of Portsmouth v. D. Pender Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API