Rodriguez v. Parks & Woolson Machine Co.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Agnes, Peter W., J.
The plaintiff, Hector Rodriguez, (“Rodriguez”) obtained a default against the defendant, Riggs & Lombard (“R&L”), for failure to appear for a court-ordered pretrial conference the purpose of which was to set a date for trial. See Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(b). A motion to remove the default was heard but denied. A motion for reconsideration was likewise denied. In accordance with Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(6), the plaintiff filed a motion for a default judgment and an assessment of damages accompanied by an affidavit and a Memorandum of Law. The defendant R&L filed a Memorandum of Lawin…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Riley v. DAVISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Keene v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.