Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Parks & Woolson Machine Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 10, 2007No. 19970831Published

1Opinion of the Court

Agnes, Peter W., J.

The plaintiff, Hector Rodriguez, (“Rodriguez”) obtained a default against the defendant, Riggs & Lombard (“R&L”), for failure to appear for a court-ordered pretrial conference the purpose of which was to set a date for trial. See Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(b). A motion to remove the default was heard but denied. A motion for reconsideration was likewise denied. In accordance with Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(6), the plaintiff filed a motion for a default judgment and an assessment of damages accompanied by an affidavit and a Memorandum of Law. The defendant R&L filed a Memorandum of Lawin…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Riley v. DAVISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Keene v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API