Turner and Boisseau v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) the defendant’s counterclaim (Docs. 18 and 20).
I. BACKGROUND
In December 1988, the defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), employed the plaintiff, Turner and Boisseau, Chartered (“Turner and Bois-seau”), to represent the defendant’s insured in Murphy v. Smock, a ease filed in the District Court of Finney County, Kansas. The case was tried to a jury on July 20,1992, but was settled prior to the conclusion of trial.
Turner and Boisseau filed suit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wanjiku v. Johnson CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Meyer Land & Cattle Co. v. Lincoln County Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Smith Ex Rel. Class Composed of All Oil & Gas Royalty Owners v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Capstan AG Systems, Inc. v. Raven Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.