Stuart v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, Anthony Stuart appeals new sentences the trial court imposed in five separate cases after Stuart successfully appealed his initial sentences and successfully sought postconviction relief from the sentences pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Stuart’s case is a procedural morass because he filed his motion to correct illegal sentences pursuant to rule 3.800(a) when his direct appeal was pending.1 This occurred before the Florida Supreme Court amended Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(d) to prohibit this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boggs v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Serrano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Stuart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Stuart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Stuart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000