Legal Opinion

Seely v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 5, 1966No. 6987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Defendant, appellant here, and one William Eugene Bolt were indicted for the crime of forcible rape. Appellant was tried separately before a jury which returned a verdict of guilty of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit rape. Following post-trial motions this appeal was perfected, and appellant raises three questions.

It is first contended that the trial court erred in permitting a written confession by Bolt to be admitted into evidence against Seely, the defendant. While it is true that ordinarily the confession of a co-defendant or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Gadsden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  3. Mendenhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  4. Trimble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Broome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Gorko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Hightower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API