Legal Opinion

Young v. Thorpe Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1935No. 30,230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff, being dissatisfied with certain findings made by the trial court, moved for amended findings or a new trial. Being only partially successful in respect of that part of her motion relating to amended findings and conclusions of law and the court having denied her motion for a new trial, she appeals.

The suit is one for an accounting and arises out of the following facts: The defendant Thorpe Bros, is a Minnesota corporation, and defendant Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hackett v. PalonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barich v. BarichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Morris v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API