Young v. Thorpe Bros.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff, being dissatisfied with certain findings made by the trial court, moved for amended findings or a new trial. Being only partially successful in respect of that part of her motion relating to amended findings and conclusions of law and the court having denied her motion for a new trial, she appeals.
The suit is one for an accounting and arises out of the following facts: The defendant Thorpe Bros, is a Minnesota corporation, and defendant Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hackett v. PalonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barich v. BarichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Morris v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936