San Francisco Health Plan v. McKesson Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In these two proposed national class actions, plaintiffs San Francisco Health Plan (“SFHP”) and the Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Kansas (“Douglas County”) allege that McKesson Corporation engaged in a racketeering en*266terprise to raise the prices of numerous brand-name prescription pharmaceuticals by stating fraudulent “average wholesale prices” beginning in late 2001, in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1964 and state law.1
Plaintiff Douglas County seeks to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In RE McKESSON GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIESDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011