Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Parnes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1990No. A89A2252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

This case involves a claim for medical (dental) malpractice. In July 1981 plaintiff Linda Schmidt had permanent crowns placed on teeth numbers 15, 18 and 19 by defendant Erwin R. Parnés, D.D.S. Schmidt visited defendant’s office several times over the next three years for other routine procedures, such as cleanings and having fillings placed in her teeth. According to his uncontradicted deposition testimony, on July 14, 1984, defendant suggested that the margins be redone on the crowns which had been placed on teeth numbers 15, 18 and 19 but Schmidt indicated she did not want to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Hunter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Hendrix v. SchrecengostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Shved v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Lasoya v. SunayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hickey v. AskrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Waters v. RosenbloomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Bieling v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Tisdale v. City of CummingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Nydia Tisdale v. City of Cumming, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API