Legal Opinion

Sena v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2010No. S-09-0192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Michael Angelo Sena, Jr., claims the district court did not follow the required procedures when it accepted his plea of no contest to a charge of battery. We conclude that the procedural requirements were met, and affirm.

ISSUE

[12] The issue stated by Mr. Sena is "Whether the trial court failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 11 of the Wyoming Rules of Criminal Procedure."

FACTS

[138] On August 15, 2008, an information was filed against Mr. Sena, charging him with "Battery-Third Offense Domestic," in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501(b) and (F()…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hicklin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Dobbins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Robert Owen Marshall, IIIWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API