Sena v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[T1] Michael Angelo Sena, Jr., claims the district court did not follow the required procedures when it accepted his plea of no contest to a charge of battery. We conclude that the procedural requirements were met, and affirm.
ISSUE
[12] The issue stated by Mr. Sena is "Whether the trial court failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 11 of the Wyoming Rules of Criminal Procedure."
FACTS
[138] On August 15, 2008, an information was filed against Mr. Sena, charging him with "Battery-Third Offense Domestic," in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501(b) and (F()…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hicklin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Dobbins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2026
- Robert Owen Marshall, IIIWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.