Legal Opinion

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Land Co. v. Lindquist

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1930No. 5702Published

1Opinion of the Court

PER. CURIAM.

This is one of thirty eases of the same general character, submitted to this court during the May session, 1929, in all of which the appellant herein was the appealing party. The cases will be found reported in 36 F.(2d) 907 et seq., and 39 F.(2d) 900. Among the eases thus submitted and decided was Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Lindquist (No. 5703) 39 F.(2d) 900, supra, and No. 5702, the ease now under consideration. In case No. 5703 it was held that the question of the statute of limitations was properly submitted to the jury, whereas in the present case it was held that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. LindquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API