Legal Opinion

Foo Long v. American Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, 27ew York county. Reversed. Action by Eoo Long against the American Surety Company.. From a j udgment for plaintiff defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The plaintiff, Foo Long, recovered a judgment against Chu Fong on trial at the circuit on the 28th of June, 1888, for the sum of $3,798.99. An appeal was taken from this judgment to the general term, *425and on the appeal the defendant in this action became the surety for the defendant in the judgment recovered at the circuit. The undertaking subscribed =by the defendant in this action was in the form prescribed by the Code, by which it undertook and agreed that the appellant will pay all costs and damages which may be awarded against him on the appeal, not exceeding $500, and also, if the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cutter v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Ammons v. WhiteheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Steinbock v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Tracy v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schuler v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Foo Long v. American Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API