Legal Opinion

Niro v. Consigli

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 7, 1969No. 15,551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarvey, P.J.

In this action, described as one of contract and tort, the plaintiff moved that he be permitted to amend his writ by increasing the ad damnum from $2,000.00 to $10,000.00. The motion was denied by the judge who made the following written ruling:

“Plaintiff’s motion to amend writ from $2,000.00 to $10,000.00 ad damnum is denied because the defendants’ right to jury trial might be prajudicied under C. 231, s. 104, as amended, of the G.L.’s. Case to stand pending appeal of denial of this motion.”

The plaintiff claiming to be aggrieved by the denial of his motion, the judge, under the provisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Desmond v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Neszery v. BeardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. LeBlanc v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. McDonough v. HoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. FloridiaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Yankee Plastics, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API