Miller v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 7 — RECOGNIZANCE cited Grim. Code, secs. 67, 68, 80, 77; 1 Slat. Law,p. 198 ; 3 Blackstone, 128 ; 2 Com. Dig., p. 3 ; 18 B. Mon., 29 ; 1 Met., 389 ; 2 Met., 385; 1 Dana, 165 ; 22 Ills. Rep., 226. cited Grim. Code, secs. 80, 88, 92. cited Grim. Code, secs. 67, 68, 77, 80,81,94,96, 184,227; 3 Met., 415,382 ; l Rev. Stat., 323,313; Hardin, 504, 505 ; 2 Dana, 139; 7 Dana, 243 ; 1 B. Mon., 70.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered the opinion of the court:
W. H. Miller was indicted for murder at the August term, 1861, of the Washington circuit court. On the day the indictment was returned into court the order shows he “was brought into court in the custody of the jailer,” plead not guilty, and the cause was continued at his instance.
At the November term, 1861, the order shows he was again “brought into court in the custody of the jailer,” and at his instance the cause was again continued, and he “ remanded into the custody of the jailer.”
On a subsequent day of this term this order was made :— “…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Vipond v. HurlburtIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by1 opinion
- Damron v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931