Legal Opinion

Kleeberg v. Eber

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 23, 2019No. 1:16-cv-09517Unknown

1Opinion

USPPL SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCH none X DATE FILED; 05/23/2019 DANIEL KLEEBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, 16-CV-9517 (LAK) (KHP) -against- OPINION AND ORDER LESTER EBER, et al., Defendants. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiffs commenced the instant diversity action in December 9, 2016 and have amended their Complaint twice. They now bring the instant Motion to file their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). Plaintiffs claim that newly…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API