Legal Opinion

Hygrosol Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Roberts

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 13, 2013No. 00213Published

1Opinion of the Court

SNITE, J.,

— In June 1996, Dr. Spiridon Spireas (“Spireas”) and Dr. Sanford Bolton (“Bolton”) submitted a patent application with the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office as inventors of processes and technologies relating to “liquisolid” technology. The patent was issued to Spireas and Bolton in October of 1998. Subsequent patents were issued to Spireas and Bolton which also involved liquisolid technology.

In June of 1998 a license agreement was executed between Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (“Mutual”) and Hygrosol Pharmaceutical Corporation (“Hygrosol”), Spireas, and Bolton for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Foster v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API