Legal Opinion

Metalico Pittsburgh Inc. v. Newman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2017No. Metalico Pittsburgh v. Newman, D. No. 354 WDA 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SOLANO, J.:

Appellant Metálico Pittsburgh, Inc. appeals from the order granting partial 1 summary judgment in favor of Appellee Allegheny Raw Materials, Inc. (“ARM”) and its current employees, Appellees Douglas Newman and Ray Medred (together, “Employees”). We reverse.

Newman and Medred formerly were employed by Metálico, a scrap metal broker, and Metálico brought this action to enforce non-solicitation provisions in their Metálico Employment Agreements. Newman and Medred began working for Me-tálico in 2011 and signed Employment Agreements that were effective as of September 19, 2011.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Synthes USA Sales, LLC v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Yoder v. T. F. Scholes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Com. of PA, DOC, DGS & DHS v. S. Heidelberg Twp. ZHB v. S. Heidelberg Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Com. of PA, DOC, DGS & DHS v. S. Heidelberg Twp. ZHB v. S. Heidelberg Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Reading S.D. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Sandlin II v. Reading Truck Body, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
  5. West Shore Home, LLC v. GraeserDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API